Tuesday 21 May 2013

What is it for?


Readers may have seen the news last week than a Maya temple in Belize has been destroyed. A road-building company, looking to use the raw materials for construction, destroyed a temple at the ancient city of Noh Mul. There was outrage in the media – how could they so flippantly destroy archaeology in this way?

But wait -- They are using their heritage (in an extremely roundabout way), to further their modern economy and infrastructure. Isn’t this, by definition, what cultural tourism is?

Is that all archaeology is nowadays – cultural tourism? Maybe its only worth (especially in the eyes of the government, perhaps), is the money that it contributes towards the economy. If this is true, if archaeology takes its worth from monetary gain, then the destruction of a temple to use its raw materials for new construction could yield greater financial results than if the archaeology remained untouched. In this era of financial incertitude, how well placed are we to criticise?


What about the ruins themselves – surely the point is that they hold some intrinsic value not connected with their financial implications.

Do they? Do old rocks matter? Why should we care? Would the world be any worse off without archaeology?
-- The answer is yes, and for two very big reasons.

1) Curiosity

Curiosity is how we learn, that I wonder if… I wonder why… moment that leads to something so much bigger. If we stopped questioning things, humanity wouldn’t advance. And sure, stop questioning archaeology, it’s just the past (it’s not, see point 2), but what would go next? History? Literature? Physics?

If we start clarifying that some questioning is irrelevant, is unimportant, then what disappears next? Without curiosity there is no human advancement, there is nothing.



2) Modern relevance

So what? you say, why does the past matter? We’ve all heard the adage – those who don’t know the past are doomed to repeat it, but archaeology is so much more than this. The opportunity to take part in an excavation offers a chance to get out of the office, to be part of a team, to do something with your hands and your body when so much of our lives are spent at desks, at computers.

Archaeology is relevant because of what ancient man managed to do. Just think about it – the Maya pyramid – it’s actually hard to imagine just how many man hours would have gone into creating that structure, in a time before JCBs and cranes, before machines. The community, and the organisation involved in building such structures can only be described as immense, and it’s a lesson we can learn today – how much greater things are together. There’s an infinity of things we can still learn from the past, and there always will be, because even if somehow we manage to dig up, to uncover everything about the past, we’ll still be able to question it, we’ll still be curious.

Archaeology matters, that’s the most important point, because these principles are applicable to every avenue of academic research and intellectual curiosity – when people stop caring, stop asking questions, that’s when humanity stops existing. The temple was important because of the dialogue it could create, and the physical link to the past that it embodied. That’s what we can’t allow archaeology to be destroyed – losing an archaeological site is like death, there is no return - it's lost forever. 

There are, of course, many things I have not said here about why the past is important, this is merely the tip of the iceberg, and just ask maritime archaeologists  (*cough*Titanic*cough) how vast they can be...

Monday 13 May 2013

Experimental Archaeology


Last week as part of the Bank Holiday weekend open day at the MAA [1] in Cambridge, I spent a couple of extremely interesting, although unfortunately brief, hours doing some Experimental Archaeology.

Experimental Archaeology is where archaeologists get to have all the fun (I say this about everything, I realise, but I do just really love archaeology). It’s where archaeologists recreate items, methods, and techniques used in the past in order to understand them more. This shouldn’t be confused with historical re-enactment, or reconstruction.

Experimental Archaeology can range through any number of activities. You can re-create an adze based on archaeological examples, and use it to destroy your enemies chop down trees. The pattern of wear this creates on the blade, and the stress lines through the timber can then be compared to archaeological examples, to see if they match – if they do it’s a fairly safe assumption that the technology that’s been recreated is extremely similar to the ones used in the past.

This type of archaeology is most useful for prehistory when we don’t have written records detailing how people lived. Sometimes the only way to access that distant past is to try to recreate it, and see if the results are the same, or if our theories are even possible! It’s all well and good theorising about possible techniques, but completely useless to try them out and find that they are completely unviable or impractical.

At the museum last week they were attempting to understand how Ice Age people would have used animals to create clothing. This involved killing and skinning a muntjac deer, before removing the fat from the skin with flint, treating it with egg yolk (or the animal’s own brains!), and finally smoking the skin with oak, which contains aldehydes that seal the skin to prevent moisture from damaging and rotting it. And there you have it – a warm and cosy Ice Age cloak. Easy.

Two (fairly) recent projects are close to my own heart (and interests!):

1) Bronze Age Boat made in Falmouth

Using only tools and materials that would have been available in the Bronze Age, a team of archaeologists, boat-builders, and interested volunteers, have built a sea-worthy boat, which was launched earlier this year.



This was a hugely ambitious project, and it was so nice to see the launch head off without sinking! For more information, see their Facebook page.

2)  Earthwork in Wiltshire

Someone built a hillfort!! This is a project at Overton Down in Wiltshire [2], first created in 1960 when an earthwork was constructed in order to understand site formation (both in the original instance, and how similar ancient sites degraded into the remains we have left today). The project is designed to last 128 years in total.

 [3]

From the above image you can see that the structure of the earthwork decayed very quickly at first, rapidly reaching a state similar to many ancient earthworks in our landscape today – suggesting that such prehistoric sites reached their current conditions fairly soon after abandonment, and have existed in stasis ever since.

From these few quick examples it’s clear that the possibilities of Experimental Archaeology are endless and exciting, and I look forward to seeing what else archaeologists come up with (and the rest of the Overton Down project, if I live that long!).





[1] Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology – great museum, definitely worth a visit.
[2] Jewell, P. A. (ed.) 1963, The Experimental Earthwork on Overton Down, Wiltshire, 1960 (British Association for the Advancement of Science).